精确的时间测量

precise time measurement(精确的时间测量)
本文介绍了精确的时间测量的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着跟版网的小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我在 C++ 中使用 time.h 来测量函数的计时.

I'm using time.h in C++ to measure the timing of a function.

clock_t t = clock();
someFunction();
printf("
Time taken: %.4fs
", (float)(clock() - t)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC);

但是,我总是将时间设为 0.0000.clock() 和 t 在单独打印时具有相同的值.我想知道是否有办法在 C++ 中精确测量时间(可能以纳秒为单位).我使用的是 VS2010.

however, I'm always getting the time taken as 0.0000. clock() and t when printed separately, have the same value. I would like to know if there is way to measure the time precisely (maybe in the order of nanoseconds) in C++ . I'm using VS2010.

推荐答案

我通常使用 QueryPerformanceCounter 函数.

I usually use the QueryPerformanceCounter function.

示例:

LARGE_INTEGER frequency;        // ticks per second
LARGE_INTEGER t1, t2;           // ticks
double elapsedTime;

// get ticks per second
QueryPerformanceFrequency(&frequency);

// start timer
QueryPerformanceCounter(&t1);

// do something
...

// stop timer
QueryPerformanceCounter(&t2);

// compute and print the elapsed time in millisec
elapsedTime = (t2.QuadPart - t1.QuadPart) * 1000.0 / frequency.QuadPart;

这篇关于精确的时间测量的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持跟版网!

本站部分内容来源互联网,如果有图片或者内容侵犯了您的权益,请联系我们,我们会在确认后第一时间进行删除!

相关文档推荐

Unable to access non-const member functions of objects in C++ std::set(无法访问 C++ std::set 中对象的非常量成员函数)
Constructing std::function argument from lambda(从 lambda 构造 std::function 参数)
STL BigInt class implementation(STL BigInt 类实现)
Sync is unreliable using std::atomic and std::condition_variable(使用 std::atomic 和 std::condition_variable 同步不可靠)
Move list element to the end in STL(在 STL 中将列表元素移动到末尾)
Why is overloading operatoramp;() prohibited for classes stored in STL containers?(为什么禁止对存储在 STL 容器中的类重载 operatoramp;()?)