Java BlockingQueue take() vs poll()(Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll())
问题描述
When consuming values from a Queue in an infinite loop -- what would be more efficient:
1) Blocking on the Queue until a value is available via take()
while (value = queue.take()) { doSomething(value); }
2) Sleeping for n milliseconds and checking if an item is available
while (true) {
if ((value = queue.poll()) != null) { doSomething(value); }
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
Blocking is likely more efficient. In the background, the thread that initially calls take()
goes to sleep if there is no element available, letting other threads do whatever they need to do. The methods that add elements to the Queue will then wake up waiting threads when an element is added, so minimal time is spent checking the queue over and over again for whether an element is available.
这篇关于Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()
基础教程推荐
- 在 Libgdx 中处理屏幕的正确方法 2022-01-01
- FirebaseListAdapter 不推送聊天应用程序的单个项目 - Firebase-Ui 3.1 2022-01-01
- 降序排序:Java Map 2022-01-01
- “未找到匹配项"使用 matcher 的 group 方法时 2022-01-01
- 无法使用修饰符“public final"访问 java.util.Ha 2022-01-01
- 设置 bean 时出现 Nullpointerexception 2022-01-01
- 减少 JVM 暂停时间 >1 秒使用 UseConcMarkSweepGC 2022-01-01
- Java Keytool 导入证书后出错,"keytool error: java.io.FileNotFoundException &拒绝访问" 2022-01-01
- 如何使用 Java 创建 X509 证书? 2022-01-01
- Java:带有char数组的println给出乱码 2022-01-01