In C++ Inheritance, Derived class destructor not called when pointer object to base class is pointed to derived class(在 C++ 继承中,当指向基类的指针对象指向派生类时,不调用派生类析构函数)
问题描述
我是新手,我知道这是一个非常基本的概念,也可能是重复的.一旦调用了构造函数,就必须调用其相应的析构函数,这不是真的吗?[代码在 Dev C++ 上运行]
I am a newbie and I know this is a very basic concept and might be a duplicate too. Is it not true that once a constructor is called its corresponding destructor has to be called? [code run on Dev C++]
class Base
{
public:
Base() { cout<<"Base Constructor
";}
int b;
~Base() {cout << "Base Destructor
"; }
};
class Derived:public Base
{
public:
Derived() { cout<<"Derived Constructor
";}
int a;
~Derived() { cout<< "Derived Destructor
"; }
};
int main () {
Base* b = new Derived;
//Derived *b = new Derived;
delete b;
getch();
return 0;
}
给出输出
Base Constructor
Derived Constructor
Base Destructor
推荐答案
您的代码有未定义的行为.基类的析构函数必须是 virtual
以便以下具有定义的行为.
Your code has undefined behavior. The base class's destructor must be virtual
for the following to have defined behavior.
Base* b = new Derived;
delete b;
来自 C++ 标准:
5.3.5 删除
3 在第一种选择中(删除对象),如果静态类型的操作数与其动态类型不同,静态类型应为操作数动态类型的基类,静态类型应具有虚析构函数或行为未定义.
3 In the first alternative (delete object), if the static type of the operand is different from its dynamic type, the static type shall be a base class of the operand’s dynamic type and the static type shall have a virtual destructor or the behavior is undefined.
所以在你的情况下,静态类型是 Base
,动态类型是 Derived
.所以 Base
的析构函数应该是:
So in your case, the static type is Base
, and the dynamic type is Derived
. So the Base
's destructor should be:
virtual ~Base() {cout << "Base Destructor
"; }
这篇关于在 C++ 继承中,当指向基类的指针对象指向派生类时,不调用派生类析构函数的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:在 C++ 继承中,当指向基类的指针对象指向派生类
基础教程推荐
- 如何使图像调整大小以在 Qt 中缩放? 2021-01-01
- 从 std::cin 读取密码 2021-01-01
- 为 C/C++ 中的项目的 makefile 生成依赖项 2022-01-01
- 使用从字符串中提取的参数调用函数 2022-01-01
- 管理共享内存应该分配多少内存?(助推) 2022-12-07
- 为什么语句不能出现在命名空间范围内? 2021-01-01
- 在 C++ 中循环遍历所有 Lua 全局变量 2021-01-01
- 如何“在 Finder 中显示"或“在资源管理器中显 2021-01-01
- Windows Media Foundation 录制音频 2021-01-01
- 如何在不破坏 vtbl 的情况下做相当于 memset(this, ...) 的操作? 2022-01-01