CUDA 设备到设备传输昂贵

CUDA Device To Device transfer expensive(CUDA 设备到设备传输昂贵)

本文介绍了CUDA 设备到设备传输昂贵的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我编写了一些代码来尝试交换二维矩阵的象限以用于 FFT,该矩阵存储在平面数组中.

I have written some code to try to swap quadrants of a 2D matrix for FFT purposes, that is stored in a flat array.

    int leftover = W-dcW;

    T *temp;
    T *topHalf;
cudaMalloc((void **)&temp, dcW * sizeof(T));

    //swap every row, left and right
    for(int i = 0; i < H; i++)
    {
        cudaMemcpy(temp, &data[i*W], dcW*sizeof(T),cudaMemcpyDeviceToDevice);
        cudaMemcpy(&data[i*W],&data[i*W+dcW], leftover*sizeof(T), cudaMemcpyDeviceToDevice);
        cudaMemcpy(&data[i*W+leftover], temp, dcW*sizeof(T), cudaMemcpyDeviceToDevice); 
    }

cudaMalloc((void **)&topHalf, dcH*W* sizeof(T));
    leftover = H-dcH;
    cudaMemcpy(topHalf, data, dcH*W*sizeof(T), cudaMemcpyDeviceToDevice);
    cudaMemcpy(data, &data[dcH*W], leftover*W*sizeof(T), cudaMemcpyDeviceToDevice);
    cudaMemcpy(&data[leftover*W], topHalf, dcH*W*sizeof(T), cudaMemcpyDeviceToDevice);

请注意,此代码采用设备指针,并执行 DeviceToDevice 传输.

Notice that this code takes device pointers, and does DeviceToDevice transfers.

为什么这似乎运行得这么慢?这可以以某种方式优化吗?与使用常规 memcpy 在主机上进行相同操作相比,我对此进行了计时,并且速度慢了大约 2 倍.

Why does this seem to run so slow? Can this be optimized somehow? I timed this compared to the same operation on host using regular memcpy and it was about 2x slower.

有什么想法吗?

推荐答案

我最终编写了一个内核来进行交换.这确实比 Device to Device memcpy 操作快

I ended up writing a kernel to do the swaps. This was indeed faster than the Device to Device memcpy operations

这篇关于CUDA 设备到设备传输昂贵的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!

本文标题为:CUDA 设备到设备传输昂贵

基础教程推荐