C++ 覆盖/重载问题

C++ override/overload problem(C++ 覆盖/重载问题)

本文介绍了C++ 覆盖/重载问题的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我在 C++ 中遇到了一个问题:

I'm facing a problem in C++ :

#include <iostream>

class A
{
protected:
  void some_func(const unsigned int& param1)
  {
    std::cout << "A::some_func(" << param1 << ")" << std::endl;
  }
public:
  virtual ~A() {}
  virtual void some_func(const unsigned int& param1, const char*)
  {
    some_func(param1);
  }
};

class B : public A
{
public:
  virtual ~B() {}
  virtual void some_func(const unsigned int& param1, const char*)
  {
    some_func(param1);
  }
};

int main(int, char**)
{
  A* t = new B();
  t->some_func(21, "some char*");
  return 0;
}

我使用的是 g++ 4.0.1 和编译错误:

I'm using g++ 4.0.1 and the compilation error :

$ g++ -W -Wall -Werror test.cc
test.cc: In member function ‘virtual void B::some_func(const unsigned int&, const char*)’:
test.cc:24: error: no matching function for call to ‘B::some_func(const unsigned int&)’
test.cc:22: note: candidates are: virtual void B::some_func(const unsigned int&, const char*)

为什么我必须指定 B 类中 some_func(param1) 的调用是 A::some_func(param1) ?是 g++ 错误还是来自 g++ 的随机消息,以防止我看不到的特殊情况?

Why do I must specify that the call of some_func(param1) in class B is A::some_func(param1) ? Is it a g++ bug or a random message from g++ to prevent special cases I don't see ?

推荐答案

问题是在派生类中,您将受保护的方法隐藏在基类中.您可以做几件事,要么完全限定派生对象中的受保护方法,要么使用 using 指令将该方法带入作用域:

The problem is that in the derived class you are hiding the protected method in the base class. You can do a couple of things, either you fully qualify the protected method in the derived object or else you bring that method into scope with a using directive:

class B : public A
{
protected:
  using A::some_func; // bring A::some_func overloads into B
public:
  virtual ~B() {}
  virtual void some_func(const unsigned int& param1, const char*)
  {
    A::some_func(param1); // or fully qualify the call
  }
};

这篇关于C++ 覆盖/重载问题的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!

本文标题为:C++ 覆盖/重载问题

基础教程推荐