Prevent C++11 removal of endless loops(防止 C++11 删除无限循环)
问题描述
As discussed in this question, C++11 optimizes endless loops away.
However, in embedded devices which have a single purpose, endless loops make sense and are actually quite often used. Even a completely empty while(1);
is useful for a watchdog-assisted reset. Terminating but empty loops can also be useful in embedded development.
Is there an elegant way to specifically tell the compiler to not remove empty or endless loops, without disabling optimization altogether?
One of the requirements for a loop to be removed (as mentioned in that question) is that it
- does not access or modify volatile objects
So,
void wait_forever(void)
{
volatile int i = 1;
while (i) ;
}
should do the trick, although I would certainly verify this by looking at the disassembly of a program produced with your particular toolchain.
A function like this would be a good candidate for GCC's noreturn
attribute as well.
void wait_forever(void) __attribute__ ((noreturn));
void wait_forever(void)
{
volatile int i = 1;
while (i) ;
}
int main(void)
{
if (something_bad_happened)
wait_forever();
}
这篇关于防止 C++11 删除无限循环的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:防止 C++11 删除无限循环


基础教程推荐
- 这个宏可以转换成函数吗? 2022-01-01
- 如何通过C程序打开命令提示符Cmd 2022-12-09
- 静态库、静态链接动态库和动态链接动态库的 .lib 文件里面是什么? 2021-01-01
- 在 C++ 中计算滚动/移动平均值 2021-01-01
- 常量变量在标题中不起作用 2021-01-01
- C++结构和函数声明。为什么它不能编译? 2022-11-07
- 如何在 C++ 中初始化静态常量成员? 2022-01-01
- 如何将 std::pair 的排序 std::list 转换为 std::map 2022-01-01
- 如何检查GTK+3.0中的小部件类型? 2022-11-30
- 我有静态或动态 boost 库吗? 2021-01-01