Prevent C++11 removal of endless loops(防止 C++11 删除无限循环)
问题描述
As discussed in this question, C++11 optimizes endless loops away.
However, in embedded devices which have a single purpose, endless loops make sense and are actually quite often used. Even a completely empty while(1);
is useful for a watchdog-assisted reset. Terminating but empty loops can also be useful in embedded development.
Is there an elegant way to specifically tell the compiler to not remove empty or endless loops, without disabling optimization altogether?
One of the requirements for a loop to be removed (as mentioned in that question) is that it
- does not access or modify volatile objects
So,
void wait_forever(void)
{
volatile int i = 1;
while (i) ;
}
should do the trick, although I would certainly verify this by looking at the disassembly of a program produced with your particular toolchain.
A function like this would be a good candidate for GCC's noreturn
attribute as well.
void wait_forever(void) __attribute__ ((noreturn));
void wait_forever(void)
{
volatile int i = 1;
while (i) ;
}
int main(void)
{
if (something_bad_happened)
wait_forever();
}
这篇关于防止 C++11 删除无限循环的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:防止 C++11 删除无限循环
基础教程推荐
- 运算符重载的基本规则和习语是什么? 2022-10-31
- C++,'if' 表达式中的变量声明 2021-01-01
- 如何在 C++ 中处理或避免堆栈溢出 2022-01-01
- 什么是T&&(双与号)在 C++11 中是什么意思? 2022-11-04
- 调用std::Package_TASK::Get_Future()时可能出现争用情况 2022-12-17
- 您如何将 CreateThread 用于属于类成员的函数? 2021-01-01
- C++ 标准:取消引用 NULL 指针以获取引用? 2021-01-01
- C++ 程序在执行 std::string 分配时总是崩溃 2022-01-01
- 如何定义双括号/双迭代器运算符,类似于向量的向量? 2022-01-01
- 设计字符串本地化的最佳方法 2022-01-01