AutoResetEvent, ManualResetEvent vs Monitor(AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器)
问题描述
Lets say I have to orchestrate a synchronization algorithm in .Net 3.5 SP1 and any of the synchronization primitives listed in the title fit perfectly for the task.
From a performance perspective, is any single one of those more performant than the others?
I ask this because I have been coding for a while now, but without proper knowledge on the subject.
If you can, go with Monitor. It's similar to a CRITICAL_SECTION. AutoResetEvent/ManualResetEvent might have slightly more overhead, since these can be shared by different processes, whereas a Monitor belongs to a single process.
这篇关于AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器
基础教程推荐
- 如何在 IDE 中获取 Xamarin Studio C# 输出? 2022-01-01
- SSE 浮点算术是否可重现? 2022-01-01
- 如何激活MC67中的红灯 2022-01-01
- c# Math.Sqrt 实现 2022-01-01
- 有没有办法忽略 2GB 文件上传的 maxRequestLength 限制? 2022-01-01
- 为什么Flurl.Http DownloadFileAsync/Http客户端GetAsync需要 2022-09-30
- rabbitmq 的 REST API 2022-01-01
- 将 Office 安装到 Windows 容器 (servercore:ltsc2019) 失败,错误代码为 17002 2022-01-01
- 将 XML 转换为通用列表 2022-01-01
- MS Visual Studio .NET 的替代品 2022-01-01