C# 7.0 ValueTuples vs Anonymous Types(C# 7.0 ValueTuples 与匿名类型)
问题描述
看看新的 C# 7.0 ValueTuples,我想知道它们是否会完全取代 Anonymous Types
.我知道 ValueTuples
是结构,因此其行为与作为类的 Anonymous Types
有点不同.但是,我没有看到使用 Anonymous Type
而不是 ValueTuple
的用例.
Looking at the new C# 7.0 ValueTuples, I am wondering if they will completely replace Anonymous Types
. I understand that ValueTuples
are structs and therefore behave a bit differently than Anonymous Types
which are classes. I don't see a use-case, however, in which I would prefer using an Anonymous Type
over a ValueTuple
.
是否存在使用 匿名类型
仍然比在 C# 7.0 中使用 ValueTuples
有益的用例?
Are there any use-cases where using an Anonymous Type
would still be beneficial over using ValueTuples
in C# 7.0?
推荐答案
匿名类型是不可变的,ValueTuple
不是.这反映在匿名类型公开属性,ValueTuple
公开字段的事实中.数据绑定几乎总是需要属性.
Anonymous types are immutable, ValueTuple
s are not. This is reflected in the fact that anonymous types expose properties, ValueTuple
s expose fields. Data binding almost always requires properties.
大量现有代码仅适用于引用类型,不适用于值类型.特别想到的是 Entity Framework 中的预测:对值类型的预测根本没有实现.
Plenty of existing code only works with reference types, not with value types. What in particular comes to mind are projections in Entity Framework: projections to value types are simply not implemented.
这篇关于C# 7.0 ValueTuples 与匿名类型的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:C# 7.0 ValueTuples 与匿名类型
基础教程推荐
- SSE 浮点算术是否可重现? 2022-01-01
- 将 XML 转换为通用列表 2022-01-01
- MS Visual Studio .NET 的替代品 2022-01-01
- 将 Office 安装到 Windows 容器 (servercore:ltsc2019) 失败,错误代码为 17002 2022-01-01
- 如何激活MC67中的红灯 2022-01-01
- 为什么Flurl.Http DownloadFileAsync/Http客户端GetAsync需要 2022-09-30
- c# Math.Sqrt 实现 2022-01-01
- 有没有办法忽略 2GB 文件上传的 maxRequestLength 限制? 2022-01-01
- rabbitmq 的 REST API 2022-01-01
- 如何在 IDE 中获取 Xamarin Studio C# 输出? 2022-01-01