snk vs. code signing certificate(snk 与代码签名证书)
问题描述
In my organization we use snk files with strong names assemblies. We generate the snk ourselves.
In addition we use a code signing signature on the binaries. We get the pfx from Verisign.
- What is the difference between these two processes?
- Isn't it a problem that the snk is not recevied from Verisign also?
The snk and pfx are used for two different purposes. The snk is used for strong-naming, which uses a key pair to uniquely identify an assembly. The pfx is for code signing, which is a similar process but one that is intended to prevent malicious tampering with assemblies that are distributed publicly. Using both on an assembly both strong-names AND signs it.
It's OK to generate your own SNK file as long as you keep the private key secure. The PFX file you get from Verisign allows you to sign the assembly using a key secured by a third party. This is an additional layer of security that lets users of your assembly know that it has not been tampered with.
这篇关于snk 与代码签名证书的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:snk 与代码签名证书
基础教程推荐
- 有没有办法忽略 2GB 文件上传的 maxRequestLength 限制? 2022-01-01
- 为什么Flurl.Http DownloadFileAsync/Http客户端GetAsync需要 2022-09-30
- 如何激活MC67中的红灯 2022-01-01
- 如何在 IDE 中获取 Xamarin Studio C# 输出? 2022-01-01
- 将 Office 安装到 Windows 容器 (servercore:ltsc2019) 失败,错误代码为 17002 2022-01-01
- MS Visual Studio .NET 的替代品 2022-01-01
- rabbitmq 的 REST API 2022-01-01
- c# Math.Sqrt 实现 2022-01-01
- 将 XML 转换为通用列表 2022-01-01
- SSE 浮点算术是否可重现? 2022-01-01