Lambdas，多个 forEach 带强制转换

Lambdas, multiple forEach with casting(Lambdas，多个 forEach 带强制转换)

问题描述

Need some help thinking in lambdas from my fellow StackOverflow luminaries.

Standard case of picking through a list of a list of a list to collect some children deep in a graph. What awesome ways could Lambdas help with this boilerplate?

public List<ContextInfo> list() {
    final List<ContextInfo> list = new ArrayList<ContextInfo>();
    final StandardServer server = getServer();

    for (final Service service : server.findServices()) {
        if (service.getContainer() instanceof Engine) {
            final Engine engine = (Engine) service.getContainer();
            for (final Container possibleHost : engine.findChildren()) {
                if (possibleHost instanceof Host) {
                    final Host host = (Host) possibleHost;
                    for (final Container possibleContext : host.findChildren()) {
                        if (possibleContext instanceof Context) {
                            final Context context = (Context) possibleContext;
                            // copy to another object -- not the important part
                            final ContextInfo info = new ContextInfo(context.getPath());
                            info.setThisPart(context.getThisPart());
                            info.setNotImportant(context.getNotImportant());
                            list.add(info);
                        }
                    }
                }
            }
        }
    }
    return list;
}

Note the list itself is going to the client as JSON, so don't focus on what is returned. Must be a few neat ways I can cut down the loops.

Interested to see what my fellow experts create. Multiple approaches encouraged.

EDIT

The findServices and the two findChildren methods return arrays

EDIT - BONUS CHALLENGE

The "not important part" did turn out to be important. I actually need to copy a value only available in the host instance. This seems to ruin all the beautiful examples. How would one carry state forward?

final ContextInfo info = new ContextInfo(context.getPath());
info.setHostname(host.getName()); // The Bonus Challenge

It's fairly deeply nested but it doesn't seem exceptionally difficult.

The first observation is that if a for-loop translates into a stream, nested for-loops can be "flattened" into a single stream using flatMap. This operation takes a single element and returns an arbitrary number elements in a stream. I looked up and found that StandardServer.findServices() returns an array of Service so we turn this into a stream using Arrays.stream(). (I make similar assumptions for Engine.findChildren() and Host.findChildren().

Next, the logic within each loop does an instanceof check and a cast. This can be modeled using streams as a filter operation to do the instanceof followed by a map operation that simply casts and returns the same reference. This is actually a no-op but it lets the static typing system convert a Stream<Container> to a Stream<Host> for example.

Applying these transformations to the nested loops, we get the following:

public List<ContextInfo> list() {
    final List<ContextInfo> list = new ArrayList<ContextInfo>();
    final StandardServer server = getServer();

    Arrays.stream(server.findServices())
        .filter(service -> service.getContainer() instanceof Engine)
        .map(service -> (Engine)service.getContainer())
        .flatMap(engine -> Arrays.stream(engine.findChildren()))
        .filter(possibleHost -> possibleHost instanceof Host)
        .map(possibleHost -> (Host)possibleHost)
        .flatMap(host -> Arrays.stream(host.findChildren()))
        .filter(possibleContext -> possibleContext instanceof Context)
        .map(possibleContext -> (Context)possibleContext)
        .forEach(context -> {
            // copy to another object -- not the important part
            final ContextInfo info = new ContextInfo(context.getPath());
            info.setThisPart(context.getThisPart());
            info.setNotImportant(context.getNotImportant());
            list.add(info);
        });
    return list;
}

But wait, there's more.

The final forEach operation is a slightly more complicated map operation that converts a Context into a ContextInfo. Furthermore, these are just collected into a List so we can use collectors to do this instead of creating and empty list up front and then populating it. Applying these refactorings results in the following:

public List<ContextInfo> list() {
    final StandardServer server = getServer();

    return Arrays.stream(server.findServices())
        .filter(service -> service.getContainer() instanceof Engine)
        .map(service -> (Engine)service.getContainer())
        .flatMap(engine -> Arrays.stream(engine.findChildren()))
        .filter(possibleHost -> possibleHost instanceof Host)
        .map(possibleHost -> (Host)possibleHost)
        .flatMap(host -> Arrays.stream(host.findChildren()))
        .filter(possibleContext -> possibleContext instanceof Context)
        .map(possibleContext -> (Context)possibleContext)
        .map(context -> {
            // copy to another object -- not the important part
            final ContextInfo info = new ContextInfo(context.getPath());
            info.setThisPart(context.getThisPart());
            info.setNotImportant(context.getNotImportant());
            return info;
        })
        .collect(Collectors.toList());
}

I usually try to avoid multi-line lambdas (such as in the final map operation) so I'd refactor it into a little helper method that takes a Context and returns a ContextInfo. This doesn't shorten the code at all, but I think it does make it clearer.

UPDATE

But wait, there's still more.

Let's extract the call to service.getContainer() into its own pipeline element:

    return Arrays.stream(server.findServices())
        .map(service -> service.getContainer())
        .filter(container -> container instanceof Engine)
        .map(container -> (Engine)container)
        .flatMap(engine -> Arrays.stream(engine.findChildren()))
        // ...

This exposes the repetition of filtering on instanceof followed by a mapping with a cast. This is done three times in total. It seems likely that other code is going to need to do similar things, so it would be nice to extract this bit of logic into a helper method. The problem is that filter can change the number of elements in the stream (dropping ones that don't match) but it can't change their types. And map can change the types of elements, but it can't change their number. Can something change both the number and types? Yes, it's our old friend flatMap again! So our helper method needs to take an element and return a stream of elements of a different type. That return stream will contain a single casted element (if it matches) or it will be empty (if it doesn't match). The helper function would look like this:

<T,U> Stream<U> toType(T t, Class<U> clazz) {
    if (clazz.isInstance(t)) {
        return Stream.of(clazz.cast(t));
    } else {
        return Stream.empty();
    }
}

(This is loosely based on C#'s OfType construct mentioned in some of the comments.)

While we're at it, let's extract a method to create a ContextInfo:

ContextInfo makeContextInfo(Context context) {
    // copy to another object -- not the important part
    final ContextInfo info = new ContextInfo(context.getPath());
    info.setThisPart(context.getThisPart());
    info.setNotImportant(context.getNotImportant());
    return info;
}

After these extractions, the pipeline looks like this:

    return Arrays.stream(server.findServices())
        .map(service -> service.getContainer())
        .flatMap(container -> toType(container, Engine.class))
        .flatMap(engine -> Arrays.stream(engine.findChildren()))
        .flatMap(possibleHost -> toType(possibleHost, Host.class))
        .flatMap(host -> Arrays.stream(host.findChildren()))
        .flatMap(possibleContext -> toType(possibleContext, Context.class))
        .map(this::makeContextInfo)
        .collect(Collectors.toList());

Nicer, I think, and we've removed the dreaded multi-line statement lambda.

UPDATE: BONUS CHALLENGE

Once again, flatMap is your friend. Take the tail of the stream and migrate it into the last flatMap before the tail. That way the host variable is still in scope, and you can pass it to a makeContextInfo helper method that's been modified to take host as well.

    return Arrays.stream(server.findServices())
        .map(service -> service.getContainer())
        .flatMap(container -> toType(container, Engine.class))
        .flatMap(engine -> Arrays.stream(engine.findChildren()))
        .flatMap(possibleHost -> toType(possibleHost, Host.class))
        .flatMap(host -> Arrays.stream(host.findChildren())
                               .flatMap(possibleContext -> toType(possibleContext, Context.class))
                               .map(ctx -> makeContextInfo(ctx, host)))
        .collect(Collectors.toList());

这篇关于Lambdas，多个 forEach 带强制转换的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持编程学习网！