boost 是否具有比 STL 更简单的集合操作数据类型?

Does boost have a datatype for set operations that is simpler than the STL?(boost 是否具有比 STL 更简单的集合操作数据类型?)

本文介绍了boost 是否具有比 STL 更简单的集合操作数据类型?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我发现 C++ STL 方法进行简单的集合操作使用起来非常笨拙.例如,求两个集合的差:

I find the C++ STL method of doing simple set operations quite clunky to use. For example, to find the difference between two sets:

std::set<int> newUserIds;
set_difference(currentUserIds.begin(), currentUserIds.end(), mPreviousUserIds.begin(), mPreviousUserIds.end(), std::inserter(newUserIds, newUserIds.end()));
std::set<int> missingUserIds;
set_difference(mPreviousUserIds.begin(), mPreviousUserIds.end(), currentUserIds.begin(), currentUserIds.end(), std::inserter(missingUserIds, missingUserIds.end()));
mPreviousUserIds = currentUserIds;

boost 是否提供了一组替代类,可以将上述示例简化为如下所示:

Does boost offer an alternative set of classes that would reduce the above example to something like this:

set_type<int> newUserIds = currentUserIds.difference(mPreviousUserIds);
set_type<int> missingUserIds = mPreviousUserIds.difference(currentUserIds);

(类似于 Qt 中的 QSet,它覆盖了 operator- 以这种方式.)

(Similar to QSet in Qt which overrides operator- in this way.)

推荐答案

参见 提升范围集算法.尽管如此,他们仍然希望有一个输出迭代器.

See Boost Range Set algorithms. They still expect an output iterator though.

这篇关于boost 是否具有比 STL 更简单的集合操作数据类型?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!

本文标题为:boost 是否具有比 STL 更简单的集合操作数据类型?

基础教程推荐