Boost C++ Serialization overhead(提升 C++ 序列化开销)
问题描述
我正在尝试使用以下代码测量序列化开销
I'm trying to measure serialization overhead with following code
const int message_size=1000;
std::vector<short> message(message_size);
std::string s((char*)(&message[0]), message_size * sizeof(short));
double size= 1000*sizeof(short);
double size2= s.size();
double overhead = size2 - size; //is zero
正确吗?(这是从矢量序列化)
如何衡量序列化开销?- 主要问题是测量序列化向量.我可以使用 Boost 进行序列化.
How can I measure serialization overhead? - main problem is to measure serialized vector. I can use Boost for serialization.
推荐答案
这个通用的测试平台应该能让你做出决定:看它生活在 Coliru 上
This generic test bed should enable you to decide: see it Live On Coliru
#include <boost/archive/binary_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/archive/xml_oarchive.hpp>
#include <boost/fusion/adapted/boost_tuple.hpp>
#include <boost/make_shared.hpp>
#include <boost/phoenix.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/array.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/shared_ptr.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/string.hpp>
#include <boost/serialization/vector.hpp>
#include <boost/tuple/tuple.hpp>
#include <iostream>
#include <sstream>
namespace detail
{
struct add_to_archive_f
{
template <typename, typename> struct result { typedef void type; };
template <typename Archive, typename T>
void operator()(Archive& ar, T const& t) const {
ar << BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(t);
}
};
static const boost::phoenix::function<add_to_archive_f> add_to_archive { };
}
template <typename Archive = boost::archive::binary_oarchive, typename... Data>
size_t archive_size(Data const&... data)
{
std::ostringstream oss;
Archive oa(oss);
boost::fusion::for_each(boost::make_tuple(data...),
detail::add_to_archive(
boost::phoenix::ref(oa),
boost::phoenix::arg_names::arg1
));
return oss.str().size();
}
template <typename Archive = boost::archive::binary_oarchive, typename... Data>
void benchmark(Data const&... data)
{
std::cout << __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ << ": " << archive_size<Archive>(data...) << "
";
}
struct Base {
boost::array<double, 1000> data;
virtual ~Base() {}
private:
friend class boost::serialization::access;
template <typename Archive> void serialize(Archive& ar, unsigned /*version*/) {
ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(data);
}
};
struct Derived : Base {
std::string x;
Derived() : x(1000, ' ') { }
private:
friend class boost::serialization::access;
template <typename Archive> void serialize(Archive& ar, unsigned /*version*/) {
ar & boost::serialization::make_nvp("base", boost::serialization::base_object<Base>(*this));
ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(x);
}
};
测试驱动程序:
template <typename Archive>
void some_scenarios()
{
benchmark<Archive>(std::vector<char>(1000));
benchmark<Archive>(boost::make_shared<std::vector<char>>(1000));
benchmark<Archive>(3.14f, 42, 42ull, "hello world");
benchmark<Archive>(boost::make_shared<Base>());
benchmark<Archive>(boost::make_shared<Derived>());
}
int main()
{
some_scenarios<boost::archive::binary_oarchive>();
some_scenarios<boost::archive::text_oarchive>();
some_scenarios<boost::archive::xml_oarchive>();
}
我的 64 位 Ubuntu 和 Boost 1.55 的输出:
The output on my 64-bit Ubuntu with Boost 1.55:
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::binary_oarchive; Data = {std::vector<char, std::allocator<char> >}]: 1052
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::binary_oarchive; Data = {boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<char, std::allocator<char> > >}]: 1059
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::binary_oarchive; Data = {float, int, long long unsigned int, char [12]}]: 76
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::binary_oarchive; Data = {boost::shared_ptr<Base>}]: 8069
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::binary_oarchive; Data = {boost::shared_ptr<Derived>}]: 9086
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::text_oarchive; Data = {std::vector<char, std::allocator<char> >}]: 2037
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::text_oarchive; Data = {boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<char, std::allocator<char> > >}]: 2043
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::text_oarchive; Data = {float, int, long long unsigned int, char [12]}]: 92
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::text_oarchive; Data = {boost::shared_ptr<Base>}]: 2049
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::text_oarchive; Data = {boost::shared_ptr<Derived>}]: 3083
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::xml_oarchive; Data = {std::vector<char, std::allocator<char> >}]: 16235
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::xml_oarchive; Data = {boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<char, std::allocator<char> > >}]: 17307
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::xml_oarchive; Data = {float, int, long long unsigned int, char [12]}]: 436
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::xml_oarchive; Data = {boost::shared_ptr<Base>}]: 19393
void benchmark(const Data& ...) [with Archive = boost::archive::xml_oarchive; Data = {boost::shared_ptr<Derived>}]: 21508
如你所见,
- XML 的开销相当大
- 对于二进制文件,对于许多不同(例如多态)小类型元素的小档案来说,开销变得很大
这篇关于提升 C++ 序列化开销的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:提升 C++ 序列化开销
基础教程推荐
- 在 C++ 中循环遍历所有 Lua 全局变量 2021-01-01
- 管理共享内存应该分配多少内存?(助推) 2022-12-07
- 如何在不破坏 vtbl 的情况下做相当于 memset(this, ...) 的操作? 2022-01-01
- 为什么语句不能出现在命名空间范围内? 2021-01-01
- 如何使图像调整大小以在 Qt 中缩放? 2021-01-01
- 从 std::cin 读取密码 2021-01-01
- 使用从字符串中提取的参数调用函数 2022-01-01
- 如何“在 Finder 中显示"或“在资源管理器中显 2021-01-01
- 为 C/C++ 中的项目的 makefile 生成依赖项 2022-01-01
- Windows Media Foundation 录制音频 2021-01-01