Why do people say there is modulo bias when using a random number generator?(为什么人们说使用随机数生成器时存在模偏差?)
问题描述
I have seen this question asked a lot but never seen a true concrete answer to it. So I am going to post one here which will hopefully help people understand why exactly there is "modulo bias" when using a random number generator, like rand()
in C++.
So rand()
is a pseudo-random number generator which chooses a natural number between 0 and RAND_MAX
, which is a constant defined in cstdlib
(see this article for a general overview on rand()
).
Now what happens if you want to generate a random number between say 0 and 2? For the sake of explanation, let's say RAND_MAX
is 10 and I decide to generate a random number between 0 and 2 by calling rand()%3
. However, rand()%3
does not produce the numbers between 0 and 2 with equal probability!
When rand()
returns 0, 3, 6, or 9, rand()%3 == 0
. Therefore, P(0) = 4/11
When rand()
returns 1, 4, 7, or 10, rand()%3 == 1
. Therefore, P(1) = 4/11
When rand()
returns 2, 5, or 8, rand()%3 == 2
. Therefore, P(2) = 3/11
This does not generate the numbers between 0 and 2 with equal probability. Of course for small ranges this might not be the biggest issue but for a larger range this could skew the distribution, biasing the smaller numbers.
So when does rand()%n
return a range of numbers from 0 to n-1 with equal probability? When RAND_MAX%n == n - 1
. In this case, along with our earlier assumption rand()
does return a number between 0 and RAND_MAX
with equal probability, the modulo classes of n would also be equally distributed.
So how do we solve this problem? A crude way is to keep generating random numbers until you get a number in your desired range:
int x;
do {
x = rand();
} while (x >= n);
but that's inefficient for low values of n
, since you only have a n/RAND_MAX
chance of getting a value in your range, and so you'll need to perform RAND_MAX/n
calls to rand()
on average.
A more efficient formula approach would be to take some large range with a length divisible by n
, like RAND_MAX - RAND_MAX % n
, keep generating random numbers until you get one that lies in the range, and then take the modulus:
int x;
do {
x = rand();
} while (x >= (RAND_MAX - RAND_MAX % n));
x %= n;
For small values of n
, this will rarely require more than one call to rand()
.
Works cited and further reading:
CPlusPlus Reference
Eternally Confuzzled
这篇关于为什么人们说使用随机数生成器时存在模偏差?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:为什么人们说使用随机数生成器时存在模偏差?


基础教程推荐
- 我有静态或动态 boost 库吗? 2021-01-01
- C++结构和函数声明。为什么它不能编译? 2022-11-07
- 如何在 C++ 中初始化静态常量成员? 2022-01-01
- 如何将 std::pair 的排序 std::list 转换为 std::map 2022-01-01
- 常量变量在标题中不起作用 2021-01-01
- 在 C++ 中计算滚动/移动平均值 2021-01-01
- 静态库、静态链接动态库和动态链接动态库的 .lib 文件里面是什么? 2021-01-01
- 这个宏可以转换成函数吗? 2022-01-01
- 如何检查GTK+3.0中的小部件类型? 2022-11-30
- 如何通过C程序打开命令提示符Cmd 2022-12-09