替代 vector<bool>

Alternative to vectorlt;boolgt;(替代 vectorbool)

本文介绍了替代 vector<bool>的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

正如(希望如此)我们都知道的那样,vector 完全被破坏,不能被视为 C 数组.获得此功能的最佳方法是什么?到目前为止,我想到的想法是:

As (hopefully) we all know, vector<bool> is totally broken and can't be treated as a C array. What is the best way to get this functionality? So far, the ideas I have thought of are:

  • 改用vector,或
  • 使用包装类并具有 vector

你们是如何处理这个问题的?我需要 c_array() 功能.

How do you guys handle this problem? I need the c_array() functionality.

作为一个附带问题,如果我不需要 c_array() 方法,如果我需要随机访问,解决这个问题的最佳方法是什么?我应该使用双端队列还是其他什么?

As a side question, if I don't need the c_array() method, what is the best way to approach this problem if I need random access? Should I use a deque or something else?

  • 我确实需要动态调整大小.
  • 对于那些不知道的人,vector 是专门的,因此每个 bool 占用 1 位.因此,您无法将其转换为 C 风格的数组.
  • 我想包装器"有点用词不当.我在想这样的事情:
  • I do need dynamic sizing.
  • For those who don't know, vector<bool> is specialized so that each bool takes 1 bit. Thus you can't convert it to a C-style array.
  • I guess "wrapper" is a bit of a misnomer. I was thinking something like this:

当然,由于可能的对齐问题,我必须读入 my_bool :(

Of course, then I have to read into a my_bool due to possible alignment issues :(

struct my_bool
{
    bool the_bool;
};
vector<my_bool> haha_i_tricked_you;

推荐答案

使用 std::deque 如果你不需要数组,是的.

Use std::deque if you don't need the array, yes.

否则使用不专门用于 bool 的替代 vector,例如 Boost 容器.

Otherwise use an alternative vector that doesn't specialize on bool, such as the one in Boost Container.

这篇关于替代 vector<bool>的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!

本文标题为:替代 vector<bool>

基础教程推荐